Featured

Wins in Litigation vs. MOOD, Stingray Updates

In summary, several events took place these past weeks all related to our litigation efforts and switching counsel to Rob Drolet’s Patent Prosecution  & Shutts and Bowen, as new counsel. Me as a Patent Owner filed IPR Replies to the “Instituted Review ” by the PTAB for the portfolio of patents in the S.D of Florida litigation MOOD MEDIA’s Motion

Continue readingWins in Litigation vs. MOOD, Stingray Updates

Featured

Stingray, MOOD MEDIA lawsuit updates

We have had recent developments, as the judge requested a magistrate judge to review “Motions to Dismiss” filed by defendants, and whether some of the counts could be dismiss with prejudice. What this means is that the accusations are not going to move forward to trial.  The resolution below indicates that All counts except, for one, will go to trial.

Continue readingStingray, MOOD MEDIA lawsuit updates

Featured

Verdict Against KOPIN and Its Economic Impact

Greater than $25M Recently, at Trial, KOPIN received a verdict against BlueRadios. The verdict covered different aspects and consequences on the wearable portfolio that KOPIN advertises to customers and  its shareholders., as(KOPIN: Microdisplays, Wearables…, including a Enterprise Wearables, site describing many of the elements that the following verdict form now will have to be shared with BlueRadio. I provided testimony on

Continue readingVerdict Against KOPIN and Its Economic Impact

Success Stories for EGLA CORP & EGLAVATOR in 2021 and Plans for 2022

We have many success stories for EGLA CORP to share.. I can share that I worked a lot in 2021 and will be working more in 2022. There is no difference on what is being accomplished specially with crypto currencies.  Many great goals, new patents filed, prosecuted, patent defense, technology licensing (e.g. Verizon Wireless) and more efforts to license patents

Continue readingSuccess Stories for EGLA CORP & EGLAVATOR in 2021 and Plans for 2022

PTAB Success for Patent Owner – Citrix

I can report a PTAB Success for a patent owner. Usually, PTAB Trials are not beneficial for patent owners and result in patent invalidity. As part of my expert witness services, I assisted Citrix in an IPR in an instituted proceeding for US Pat. No. 8,135,432. This IPR was as usual hard to complete and get the appropriate outcome was

Continue readingPTAB Success for Patent Owner – Citrix

Featured

Expert Witness Services and Consulting – EGLA LABS

  How can we help? EGLA CORP are true Expert Witness Services and technology consultants.  EGLA has intellectual property experts with hands-on engineering experience that can substantiate your reports using specifications, logs, code reviews, technological samples, etc.  EGLA CORP counts with several tools for engineering design, for starters a  patented mobile simulator for emulating “Evolved Packet Core” LTE systems using 3GPP

Continue readingExpert Witness Services and Consulting – EGLA LABS

Featured

Inter Partes Review Consultant – Sample Declarations and Reports

As an Inter Partes Review Consultant, I draft declarations and assist my clients in Federal court and PTAB. I have experience assisting clients from startups to major corporations.   In general, IPRs are now used as defense during patent infringement cases.  During the IPR process, we will be  evaluating prior-art and preparing reports for either a Patent Owner or a

Continue readingInter Partes Review Consultant – Sample Declarations and Reports

Music Choice and Stingray Digital Trial

This article provides a summary for the “Music Choice vs. Stingray Digital” Trial and other updates for the case. Back in October 2018, August 2018, October 2017 and July 2017, I reviewed this case and made my observations which are now becoming a reality. First, I stated the the IPR Board was going to allow several claims that were challenged

Continue readingMusic Choice and Stingray Digital Trial

IPR Declaration and Expert Witness Assistance

What is an IPR? An IPR Declaration is required for the “Inter Partes Review” (IPR). This process includes a “Petitioner,” a company filing a petition,  and a “Patent Owner” that owns a disputed patent.   The “Petitioner” files this petition because it believes a “Patent Owner” (PO) owns an invalid patent, and decides to challenge its validity, not as part

Continue readingIPR Declaration and Expert Witness Assistance

Music Choice Patent Axed Partially by PTAB

   Late September and early October total of two judgments have been filed thus far by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) in the case against Music Choice’s patent. As indicated in the rulings for IPR2017-00888 and IPR2017-01191, partial axing fo the patents have been granted to Stingray or against Music Choice’s interest.  Interesting findings that enforce the value

Continue readingMusic Choice Patent Axed Partially by PTAB

Music Choice Acquisition or Stingray’s patent defense?

Music Choice Acquisition was announced this week. Stingray Digital made an offer to acquire Music Choice for US$120M. In this world of media consolidation, there are very few players left in the world of “Music for Cable” TV.   Stingray Digital, Music Choice, and MEVIA (our technology). During the earnings call on August 8th, 2018  Mr. Eric Boyko, president and

Continue readingMusic Choice Acquisition or Stingray’s patent defense?

Music Choice vs Stingray Digital – Case 2:16-cv-586-JRG-RSP

Music Choice vs Stingray Digital – Case 2:16-cv-586-JRG-RSP  vs.  We will discuss in the article, the judge’s order (Judge Roy Payne) and memorandum regarding all the claims terms and its construction. As expected, the judge went for: “[C]laims ‘must be read in view of the specification, of which they are a part.’” Id. (quoting Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., 52

Continue readingMusic Choice vs Stingray Digital – Case 2:16-cv-586-JRG-RSP

Scroll Up
Visit Us On TwitterVisit Us On FacebookVisit Us On YoutubeVisit Us On LinkedinCheck Our FeedVisit Us On Instagram