music choice | Edwin Hernandez, PhD

Featured

cloud to cable, Damages Models, Expert Witness, IPR, Music for Cable TV, Panduit Test

Announced Settlement Music choice and Stingray Digital for $13M

February 5, 2020July 4, 2020 wincho

Music Choice vs Stingray Settlement arrives right before trial. This case has been analyzed by me, from an expert witness perspective from two angles: ♠ Technology and Patent infringement 7 Validity ♠ Damages and Liablitiy Exposure On February 4th, 2020, a Settlement with Music Choice announced that has the case settled for $13.3M right before an important hearing and a potential

Continue readingAnnounced Settlement Music choice and Stingray Digital for $13M

Damages Models, Panduit Test, USPTO

Non-Infringing Alternatives : Loss Profits vs. Reasonable Royalty

January 27, 2020January 29, 2022 wincho

Non-Infringing Alternatives are important when determining damages and what is called, the Panduit Test. Damages experts usually have two choices when calculating damages in intellectual property cases: Loss Profits, Reasonable Royalty There are numerous cases where loss profits are computed, and how in some cases even arriving to a reasonable royalty might be confusing and complicated. Patent Damages theories including

Continue readingNon-Infringing Alternatives : Loss Profits vs. Reasonable Royalty

Claim Construction, Cloud, cloud to cable, IPR, Mediamplify, Mevia, Patents, USPTO

Music Choice Patent Axed Partially by PTAB

October 15, 2018November 2, 2018 wincho

Late September and early October total of two judgments have been filed thus far by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) in the case against Music Choice’s patent. As indicated in the rulings for IPR2017-00888 and IPR2017-01191, partial axing fo the patents have been granted to Stingray or against Music Choice’s interest. Interesting findings that enforce the value

Continue readingMusic Choice Patent Axed Partially by PTAB

Claim Construction, IPR, Patents, USPTO

Music Choice Acquisition or Stingray’s patent defense?

August 8, 2018January 4, 2020 wincho

Music Choice Acquisition was announced this week. Stingray Digital made an offer to acquire Music Choice for US$120M. In this world of media consolidation, there are very few players left in the world of “Music for Cable” TV. Stingray Digital, Music Choice, and MEVIA (our technology). During the earnings call on August 8th, 2018 Mr. Eric Boyko, president and

Continue readingMusic Choice Acquisition or Stingray’s patent defense?

cloud to cable, Patents, software

IPR – Music Choice vs Stingray Digital

October 20, 2017November 1, 2018 wincho

Inter-Parties Review – Case Music Choice vs Stingray Digital – PTAB Board (Patent Trial and Appeal Board) The case between Music Choice and Stingray Digital had a major update. An IPR was filed a few months ago by Stingray to challenge the validity of Music Choice’s patents. October 2017 bas been filled with decisions and milestones made by the IPR

Continue readingIPR – Music Choice vs Stingray Digital

Claim Construction, Cloud, EGLA, EGLA MEDIA PLATFORM, Inventions, Mediamplify, Mevia, Music for Cable TV, Patents

Music Choice vs Stingray Digital – Case 2:16-cv-586-JRG-RSP

July 9, 2017July 28, 2017 wincho

Music Choice vs Stingray Digital – Case 2:16-cv-586-JRG-RSP vs. We will discuss in the article, the judge’s order (Judge Roy Payne) and memorandum regarding all the claims terms and its construction. As expected, the judge went for: “[C]laims ‘must be read in view of the specification, of which they are a part.’” Id. (quoting Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., 52

Continue readingMusic Choice vs Stingray Digital – Case 2:16-cv-586-JRG-RSP

Social Media Icons